Przybysz
Blog Response
Blog Response
Blog Response
Blog Response
Time Journals
Time Journals
Time Journals
Blog Response
When reading Octavia Butler’s excerpts from The River, I found it to be a page turner that kept my attention and made me want more. I think what captivated me from the beginning was the overall sense of not knowing. You feel bombarded just as the main character, Dana, was bombarded with questions from the police- Do you remember anything? Did he do this to you? What happened? There is feeling of confusion, of urgency, as you only learn one character’s name at the time…Kevin. Which shows that he is going to be a very important character throughout the whole book if he is the first one, we meet (on a name basis). I find Kevin to be very cryptic as a whole, he was in custody then let go and when he talked to Dana, he hoped that she wouldn’t remember anything -and he doesn’t care what happened to Dana when she teleports to another time- which I will get to in a little bit. But Kevin is going to be one to watch for sure.
In chapter 1, I wish there was more given as to it started and stopped pretty abruptly. Which makes sense -it wasn’t overly long, and you want to keep the suspense going. But I think this could also just be me talking from a standpoint of wanting more. For a fiction piece it had great speed as Dana teleports/time travels back to this Southern, 1800s (maybe) setting, where she saves this boy from drowning. I thought it was crazy how she became so immersed and was even drenched when she came back to ‘present day’. I couldn’t understand how she just disappeared, and Kevin didn’t care as… or he cared but then it seemed to not bother him -which if it where me I would have so many questions about everything that had just happened. I have a feeling that Kevin knows everything about Dana and what she is capable of doing.
Overall, it is interesting to view this piece of fiction in the Time-based media course because it time-based itself. Not only is time important in the book when she time travels but also in the actual world such as when it is published i.e. year, place, where, overall political/societal state, etc. When the book is being written it is also put into its own time-based world. Being fiction, the author creates their own time and place (historical fiction, sci-fi, dystopian, etc.), creating lives that live and die. They can create new situations and new values for people who don’t exist -although there are some that are strongly based off of other-real people, which adds another layer of time. There are different levels of time that are shown in both the physical book and in the actual story. I guess thinking this way would also take the writing process into light -writing ideas and taking things out, rephrasing and then adding in completely new plots. It is so interesting to read the scientific papers about time and then compare it to fiction, they are just so drastically different while having similar concepts.
Octavia Butler
Octavia Butler
Kindred excerpt Prologue and The River
Kate Brettkelly-Chalmers brings multiple arguments and notable points to the table when writing about time in contemporary art. She raises questions and answers some of them with compiled research, and observations, from multiple individuals made up of artists, scholars and philosophers. I am not quite sure which chapter happens to be my favorite or the one I found most interesting, but I admire how each chapter references one another to build. Specifically, how chapter three and then chapter five’s content flowed into one another. In both sections, there were multiple observations of ‘women’s work’ in art and time. This I found really interesting as she brings to light what other artists have demonstrated in multiple performance works, but then I noticed how it seems to become a timeless theme. The idea of women through time -and what they should be doing throughout their time, comes in a variety of ideologies. Although they differ between men and women, they also differ from woman to woman. There can be a general consensus about the subject, but when represented they are performed in a wide variety of intensity and content. Performances range from washing the stairs in front of the museum when it holds an exhibition of your work, to rocking back and forth “waiting” for the woman’s life to begin, to setting up your bed on display after a hard breakup to show how you were living your life for months… I guess what I am getting to, is that for women, there are multiple forms that ‘women’s work’ is expressed. All do not follow the standard cookie cutter thought that everything is fine- no, they make you uncomfortable, they make you think about what is going on in their head or what exactly is going on in front of you. So, after that long observation and explanation, I guess chapters three and five were my favorite.
When reading throughout the four chapters, I also thought it was interesting how many different theories and observations of time there are. There are so many layers that can be picked through when watching or observing a piece of art, but also just throughout life and living experience. There are a lot of terms that I did not think about. Terms like phenomenology and thinking about the difference between absolute and modern time- just to name a few. These chapters really made me think about where I am putting my time and if I am putting it in the right place… if there even is a ‘right place’ to dispose my time. It also made me think of different ways to create art that has not only meaningful in space but in time. And although those two elements -space and time- work contemporaneous to one another, they also are separate- to me at least. The work can be meaningful for the whole duration it is exercised in, for the amount of time it takes to complete, the time that of which it is currently in -whether relating to politics or current social awareness- or even maybe it is meaningful to the artist or observer themselves in that given moment of time. There are so many layers that were discovered in these chapters when discussed as a group that has helped me to understand Brettkelly-Chalmers writing, way better than I think I would when reading on my own.
Kate Brettkelly-Chalmers'
Time, Duration, and Change in Contemporary Art
Chapters 1-3, 5
My first initial thoughts to Octavia Butler’s The Evening and the Morning and the Night, is that DGD would be terrifying to witness and experience. The excerpt as a whole, was interesting… I am not quite sure if it topped The River -I found it a little slow at times, but nonetheless it was still a good read. After reading, it made me think about a lot of things… a lot of stuff that I have been thinking about -in general- since the beginning of quarantine which has been an odd parallel, and it all comes from the last two pages of the excerpt. It is when Lynn and Alan were talking about the pheromone that only Lynn has, that can help the DGD individuals. It was after Alan was overwhelmed with the new information about Lynn and then they began to go back and forth talking it out (sort of). Alan asks Lynn if she was considering running a retreat for people… Lynn considers it and responds along the lines of ‘you’d do it too if the pheromone was only for men’. Then they both head home from the retreat that they were visiting (Butler 417-418). When I finished reading this, I took a long minute. The first little bit, I was confused because this is all they have been trying to do -trying to figure out how to stop DGD individuals from mutilating themselves- and now they have an answer. Lynn can literally save lives but the thought of being in control and this ability is unsettling for her… maybe because Alan was right there -aware of her ability- and it wouldn’t be a secret she could keep from him. Or, maybe, it is because of another point that she and Alan thought of, which is ‘being controlled’-which in my mind it would similar to type of mind control, a hypnotization, that I also don’t know how I would feel about it. But all of this paralleled to what I have been thinking about so oddly because it connected to my thinking of our abilities. I have been reflecting a lot about the month of March in general and what I did/can do -all the ‘coulda-shoulda-woulda’ things- but mostly about capabilities. All the questions such as, if we can change our lives (and other’s) would we? If you could, would you? Is it about having power or is it about helping? This also brought up the thoughts about how people influence our opinions and our split decisions, only because we don’t want to be perceived a certain way and judged for what we say ‘yes’ and ‘no’ to. I mean would Lynn make the decision to start a retreat if Alan wasn’t there?... she probably would, there is difference between input and output -your and other’s opinions- from which certain moments are affected. Where in that instance if she wouldn’t have the thought of “controlling Alan” side of the action, it would most likely be a thought of only help and hope. Sometimes I think that individuals are oblivious to what they are capable of in general- in Lynn’s case that was completely a new thing to learn about, but for many, a lot of things will hinder us from completing tasks, helping others -ourselves- because of an outside voice chimed in. Sometimes it can also be for the better but other times we have to take that chance or we will never know.
Octavia Butler
The Evening and the Morning and the Night excerpt
For starters, I enjoyed the two passages Learning to Die in the Anthropocene and the Experimental Geography: From Cultural Production to the Production of Space, they were both different… yet… very similar a way that I will get to later on.
In Roy Scanton’s, Learning to Die in the Anthropocene, it was really pessimistic, looking at all of the true negatives of society and our lives. I found it relevant and also found myself agreeing with most to all of his remarks. Personally, I would consider myself an optimist who has been leaning to the pessimistic side at times as I become “aware” of events and people in the world today. At times it is hard to remain positive and look for the good when everything tries to get you down, however, I am not a person to go posting about political views, natural disasters and conflicts, in order to ‘help’ -without actually helping. Which is why I think I agreed with the article more than I thought I would. He talks about how people make posts and comments to spread the fear -to often cover their own- or for us to be scared with them. From these actions I can pin a couple of people I know to this standard. Despite all the doom and gloom that Scranton presents, his solution to reduce the chaos was to sit with the information, let it simmer, and not repost. Although, at times, this could be a recipe to drive you insane and have emotional turmoil for a little bit of time, actually taking the time to lead to a mindful acceptance of events and an internal realization of things you can do to either cope, support or negate the contagious fear comes in time.
In Trevor Paglen’s, Experimental Geography…, I liked how he broke down and explained how geographers often look for the production of art in space. I thought it was interesting to learn about how they also look for the contextual meaning and how the art contributes to the overall space -vice versa. I think from the viewpoint it contributes a whole other layer to the meaning of the work -quite frankly, it can create a whole other piece within itself.
This idea kind of brings the two together. Although these two pieces are very different in the content that they share, they do have a commonality of producing something. Scanton wants the individual to produce ideas for themselves and to produce an acceptance with what they possess. While Paglen explains the many layers of productions -it is not only commercial art but a thoughtfulness of the space found and contributed to. The individual is space by which they are filled with the nonsense of life and art, and they can determine what kind of space they want to be, and what kind of art they want to be occupied with. Both Paglen and Scanton look to reinvent the human freedom – maybe it’s having a clear mind in a chaotic world or being able to experiment more interdisciplinary- they want to produce a new wholesome environment for all individuals.